- Deduplicate online, doc search queries across research iterations.
This avoids running previously run online, doc searches again and
dedupes online, doc context seen by model to generate response.
- Deduplicate online search queries generated by chat model for each
user query.
- Do not pass online, docs, code context separately when generate
response in research mode. These are already collected in the meta
research passed with the user query
- Improve formatting of context passed to generate research response
- Use xml tags to delimit context. Pass per iteration queries in each
iteration result
- Put user query before meta research results in user message passed
for generating response
This deduplications will improve speed, cost & quality of research mode
Previously the whole research mode response would fail if the pick
next tool call to chat model failed. Now instead of it completely
failing, the researcher actor is told to try again in next iteration.
This allows for a more graceful degradation in answering a research
question even if a (few?) calls to the chat model fail.
Jina search API returns content of all webpages in search results.
Previously code wouldn't remove content beyond max_webpages_to_read
limit set. Now, webpage content in organic results aree explicitly
removed beyond the requested max_webpage_to_read limit.
This should align behavior of online results from Jina with other
online search providers. And restrict llm context to a reasonable size
when using Jina for online search.
This fixes chat with old chat sessions. Fixes issue with old Whatsapp
users can't chat with Khoj because chat history doc context was
stored as a list earlier
Command rate limit wouldn't be shown to user as server wouldn't be
able to handle HTTP exception in the middle of streaming.
Catch exception and render it as LLM response message instead for
visibility into command rate limiting to user on client
Log rate limmit messages for all rate limit events on server as info
messages
Convert exception messages into first person responses by Khoj to
prevent breaking the third wall and provide more details on wht
happened and possible ways to resolve them.
Previously the batch start index wasn't being passed so all batches
started in parallel were showing the same processing example index
This change doesn't impact the evaluation itself, just the index shown
of the example currently being evaluated
- Document is first converted in the chatinputarea, then sent to the chat component. From there, it's sent in the chat API body and then processed by the backend
- We couldn't directly use a UploadFile type in the backend API because we'd have to convert the api type to a multipart form. This would require other client side migrations without uniform benefit, which is why we do it in this two-phase process. This also gives us capacity to repurpose the moe generic interface down the road.
- Why
We need better, automated evals to measure performance shifts of Khoj
across prompt, model and capability changes.
Google's FRAMES benchmark evaluates multi-step retrieval and reasoning
capabilities of AI agents. It's a good starter benchmark to evaluate Khoj.
- Details
This PR adds an eval script to evaluate Khoj responses on the the FRAMES
benchmark prompts against the ground truth provided by it.
Script allows configuring sample size, batch size, sampling queries from the
eval dataset.
Gemini is used as an LLM Judge to auto grade Khoj responses vs ground truth
data from the benchmark.
This was previously required, but now it's only usefuly for more
advanced settings, not typical for self-hosting users.
With recent updates, the user's selected chat model is used for both
Khoj's train of thought and response. This makes it easy to
switch your preferred chat model directly from the user settings
page and not have to update this in the admin panel as well.
Reflect these code changse in the docs, by removing the unnecessary
step for self-hosted users to create a server chat setting when using
an OpenAI proxy service like Ollama, LiteLLM etc.
