artemp 38da080f82 make concrete image_data type names more expressive and explicit about color channels/depth: ... image_data_32 -> image_data_rgba8 image_data_8 -> image_data_gray8 image_data_16 -> image_data_gray16 image_data_float32 -> image_data_gray32f NOTE: currently image_data_gray16::pixel_type = std::int16_t (signed 16 bit int) to match GDAL should we support unsigned types?		2014-12-04 11:02:42 +01:00
..
mapnik	make concrete image_data type names more expressive and explicit about color channels/depth:	2014-12-04 11:02:42 +01:00
build.py	refactor markers placements	2014-07-29 11:52:39 +00:00