Updated RFC: Raster color interpretation (markdown)
parent
7a473f31f2
commit
d5e6dbf5c2
1 changed files with 10 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ The band parameter could have the following values:
|
|||
Same as `rgba:1,2,3,4`
|
||||
|
||||
- `grayscale[:<n>]`
|
||||
|
||||
Where `<n>` is an integer representing 1-based band indexes.
|
||||
|
||||
- 'grayscale'
|
||||
|
@ -38,8 +39,8 @@ The band parameter could have the following values:
|
|||
|
||||
- `<n>`
|
||||
|
||||
Same as `data:<n>`
|
||||
This is for backward compatibility with the GDAL plugin
|
||||
Same as `data:<n>`.
|
||||
**This is for backward compatibility with the GDAL plugin**
|
||||
|
||||
- `auto`
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -50,5 +51,10 @@ The band parameter could have the following values:
|
|||
|
||||
- `-1`
|
||||
|
||||
Same as `auto`
|
||||
This is for backward compatibility with the GDAL plugin
|
||||
Same as `auto`.
|
||||
**This is for backward compatibility with the GDAL plugin**
|
||||
|
||||
- `0`
|
||||
|
||||
Same as `auto`.
|
||||
This is for consistency (since band numbers are 1-based)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue